FRN NEWSLETTER

1359 Chandler Ave., Lincoln Park, MI. USA,48146-2009

Office: 313.294.0579, Blackberry: 734.775.2267, E-mail: chrisdardzinski@yahoo.com

WE invite ALL to visit our website: www.freewebs.com/frnnewsletter/

Contact: Christopher J. Dardzinski, Publisher & Political Consultant

“If you are reading this, then you are the movement”

06.07.2009

“Words From The Several States: The Movement, part 003

China's end game and will conservative talk radio be in the trenches with us.

I was watching C-span the other night. Man it's been awhile since I started off like that.

There were several China “experts” on a panel.

These panels I tell ya. Panels upon panels, put together by all the really cool think tanks in DC. Did you know there are approximately 100 think tanks in DC? Did you know there are about 575 nationwide? Did you ever think I would waste 16 seconds of your life to read those two previous sentences?

One day, I'm going to do a “Movement writing” on think tanks, and you may consider this fair warning.

Sigh . . . .

The panels went into a small bit of detail, beyond the talking heads of evening news. I feel as though they are positioning themselves for good camera time, so they can use it for their Amazon or you-tube book hawking purposes.

Disappointing at best . . . .

So lets break it down, the way FRN Newsletter only can:

• China's GDP in 2008 was $4.222 Trillion

• Last year their economy grew at a rate of 9.8. A bad economic year for China, since they grew 13% the year before.

• If China grows at 10%/annual for the next decade, they will easily hit a GDP of $11 Trillion.

• China's economy is poised to surpass Japan, soon enough to make them the world's second largest economy.

• China has a 400 million strong “middle-labor class” that will become a true middle class.

• China still has 800 million people living in their rural regions. Again, this point can never be stressed enough, China literally has a inexhaustible supply of cheap labor. No matter how many Chinese move squarely into a “Middle/management class” status, the central government can plan an economy based on labor for pennies. Only in a Communist nation, of a culture like China's, is this possible. India has the same level of population, but a very different culture and government system.

These bullet points mean that China can remain communist, have a consumer based middle class, and shift part of their manufacturing base, to satisfy domestic purchasing.

China does not need the USA for a market. In ten years or less, they will have a middle class capable of sustaining their economic growth at a robust 8%. Slow for China, very fast for the rest of the world.

America is entering a “dark age” of economic growth, for the next ten years. I level of debt we have will keep us from growing more than 3%, it is a simple fact of hydraulics. China will still make tons of cash off our market, but we will be stagnate, as they flurish.

China is signing energy deals with everyone. They buy raw materials from everyone.

China's endgame is to keep an economy going off of domestic middle -class purchasing, throw a political bone or two to small villages, and remain communist at the top.

.

Leaders in Beijing do not sit around deciding all the details of how to “plan” economic growth for the next ten years, or the past ten years. But America must remember this, China does have a planned economy. They know they want more capacity in coal fired plants, nuclear plants, auto production, mining, plastics, oil imports, computers and heavy weapons. The Beijing leadership does decide on these things.

In Ten years China will have a 400 million strong middle-class that will purchase enough goods to grow the economy. When that happens China will turn to the world and demand a global currency.

This is where American leadership has failed miserably after the Nixon Administration. In the last 35 years America has rolled out not one cohesive China policy, beyond the fact that our companies want plants there and want to sell them Coca Cola and Blue Jeans. We failed on the jeans and the soda, and China just keeps on writing checks, buying our plants.

I see no one within the Obama administration who has a light bulb on.

Hey Washington! China has a plan!

Now lets move on to conservative talk radio, which leaves me almost as un-satisfied as our China policies.

Maybe it's me, I have been cranky these last 31 years, as I expect a lot from leaders, elected and un-elected, within our republic.

Several conservative talk radio hosts have gained true national caliber of power, and global appeal.

This is a good thing. Any one who works there butt off 12 hours a day in radio, and has talent, should reap all the success they can.

But I'm not interested in that part. I'm talking now of the war in America, between Freedom and Socialism.

I use these blunt terms because we are so far past having time to be neat and cute about all of this.

As I have stated before, and will do again in an up coming piece, certain things do need to happen in a certain order.

Number one will always be, that we stop the FED from printing (creating) worthless fiat money. It remains the only way to break the cycle of debt financing and the only way to take true power away from those who seek to bankrupt America.

Number two, we must eliminate the IRS, federal income tax and the capital gains tax.

Number “2.1” is to gut federal government spending, at the same time you are doing number two, so that true sovereignty is returned to state control and levels, and people regain control over their lives.

Number three, is trade deals that are fair, free and simple.

These things must happen in order, so that you are stopping the destroyers ability to destroy; at the same time that you are opening up resources that all of us can touch, use and benefit from.

This is not my theory on how things should happen. This is the plain simple truth of how you begin to restore our Constitution, our economy and our freedom as individuals.

When push really comes to shove, and there becomes a real intellectual war in this nation (which started about five years ago). I want to know if conservative talk radio hosts will be on the side of the Constitution, or if they will sheepishly support the republican party, trying to convince their audiences that, all we have to do is return Republicans to Congressional and white house control, and they will do all this.

Thats a bunch of crap.

Reagen, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. had 20 years between them in the oval office, and there was never one word about total elimination of our current tax code or repealing the federal reserve act, etc.

I am certain that Mike Savage will be in the trenches with me, fighting for FED elimination , a new gold standard, and so on.

Mark Scott, God rest his soul, would have led the charge.

Mark Levin is almost there, but every now and then, he backs off, and starts talking about how we have to return the republican party to conservative control. But when the real war for America hits a high gear, I think he will be next to me in the trench.

Rush and Hannity? Now here is where i must really call them out, right?

These two have huge audiences, they know how big they are.

These two guys could truly lead a national movement, for the four things I listed. But they almost always fall short.

I'm sure it is just a matter of education, when it comes to the federal reserve system. Both would understand, maybe I should send them my early columns and get them up to speed.

Both men still seem to have some love affair with the system and a belief in the republican party. It is not a bad thing for them to believe this waty, they live and breath a conservative life style.

I do expect more from them, because of the huge power they hold in conservative talk radio.

I don't believe either man will be in our trenches, when it comes to the gold standard, repealing the FED, ripping out the tax code, etc.

I just don't see that they have the hearts of real warriors.

I hope i am wrong.

What is funny about the two big guys of Conservative talk, is that everyone else thinks they are to far to the right. Whatever the hell that means. As if political theory and ideology can been graphed against a straight line.

Go ahead main-stream media, slug it out with Conservative talk radio, at the end of the day, it leaves me still hoping for an elevated debate.

If you are reading this, then you are the movement.